What are the issues of the world without borders?
Utopian world, free of borders of countries, nations, languages, monetary systems or by any other means, nor a culture, has been a heated debate and controversial topic in the world. Some alternatives are even present today, e.g. European Union, where borders are usually taken as a mere sociopolitical and geographical line. Besides, in terms of economics, culture and many other aspects, countries are striving to come together to unification. This open borders position may sound new and radical, but it is simply impossible to realize and rudimentary.
In the past, many civilizations and emperors tried to unify nations under one ruler, many had almost achieved in doing so. For example, Mongol Empire, under the reign of Genghis Khan, is to these days considered as the biggest to have existed. The history teaches us in the example of the aforementioned empire, the bigger they are the harder it is to control. The law would not have the power it had today and it would be much more difficult to track down the outlaw criminals, fugitives. It would be impossible for police to control such masses of people. In case of strikes or even revolutions, police would be helpless and the brute force would end the one and the only country in the world, if not all.
Second of all, the uniqueness of all nations, cultures, traditions and languages would be lost. One country means one governing force which means one language. Solution for universal language here is easy, it is English, since it is widely known language, and according to Wikipedia over 2 billion people speak English. However, It will bring about detrimental effect on other languages with time in question. As a fact, with a language culture will fade away as well. Unfortunately, such examples are not rare in the history. In addition, there are too many factors to include to enforce tranquility between people and ensure peace among races and even religions.
In conclusion, everyone living in one country in peace, no borders, no prejudice, with an ability of going anywhere without a passport may seem very alluring. There may be even no wars, no armies or nationalism. No borders policy, however, will do more harm to the cultures and nations across the worlds that have been around for eons then we can imagine. Hence, we should enjoy what we have and not cry for things what we cannot have.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | Dương Ái Nhi | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Dương Ái Nhi | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Duong Gia Han | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | ngocminhho | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | TranthikimNgoc | 89 | view |
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Companies are responsible only for making money for their investors Therefore They should not be held accountable for the environmental and social cost of their business activity to society as a whole Businesses should do no more than concentrate on makin 83
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'borders'' or 'border's'?
Suggestion: borders'; border's
...n no wars, no armies or nationalism. No borders policy, however, will do more harm to t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, e.g., hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94264339152 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68959757442 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593516209476 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4451677733 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.380952381 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134494057415 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297524218383 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480085397781 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808400904242 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070866220194 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.