The how-to-be of formal education has invariably been a topic of debate. In this regard, opinions are divided as to whether a broad university education is beneficial or a specialized one. When it comes to education, it is my firm conviction that specialized education and a specific field of study beseem for burgeoning individuals as well as society.
First of all, the specified education is congruous with our brain capability. Our tabula rasa, or rather our brain in the early stage of development, from the beginning of acquiring knowledge, about both ourselves and our environment, embarks upon the odyssey of learning with an endless variety of experiences. However, not only does the brain inherently marshal data, but it also specifies data pragmatically. Therefore, one should consider that specified education is in accordance with one’s learning and recognizing his world with his per se limitations, which are to be useful in understanding and advancing the field of study.
Secondly, the specified Education, or rather “vertical” Education, nurture adept individuals in society, a hive of activity. At first blush, in the broad education, it would be better to say “ horizontal” education, one is supposed to acquire quite a bit of knowledge, about nearly everything, but on second thought, it stands to reason that obtaining in-depth knowledge just in one scope impose much more time on the person to have an expert eye at one field. In terms of professional view, Specified Education gives status to limited but in-depth knowledge rather than a broad but shallow one so that one can have practical experience which would be beneficial for their community spirit. It is taken for granted that in the status quo of modern societies as such has become so complicated that it is of much necessity that one advanced society has had a spectrum of meticulous know-how experts in each field. Hence, nowadays, specified education outweighs the broad one to prosper society.
Thirdly, the specified education is designed to be used in conjunction with the economic climate. Retrospectively, broad education is based on the old paradigm, where universities were dedicated to pursuing humanities and pure sciences. However, in effect, the current situation is dramatically different for the sake of economic plights, so the career readiness view seems remunerative. To this view, the production of education is to produce graduates for the market economy, and Students are to be geared toward professional training and providing job opportunities. Students would be encouraged to choose courses based on market needs, not on their intellectual curiosity.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the specified university is outstripping in our on-the-ground experience. This is because its contributions are compatible with our needs as human beings and help us to progress in many aspects of our life.
- People today spend too much on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 90
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 83
- Some people argue for a broad university education in which students learn about many different subjects Others argue for a specialized university education in which students learn only about a specific field of study Which position do you agree with U 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...e. In this regard, opinions are divided as to whether a broad university education is benefic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39565217391 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22695699038 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539130434783 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8239554378 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.631578947 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239405610775 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721659882323 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424583026479 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129041829018 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494086842082 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.