It is socially viewed that the optimum move to promote people's well being is by providing more exercise facilities, while some argue, that it will not help much, therefore other alternatives should be put into place. This essay agrees that there are other measures less costly and effective which can be practised for improved health.
Affordability of food stuff has shown to be the major contributer to unhealthy eating habits. Too much consumption of fast foods cause a rise in conditions; such as, heart disease and diabetes mellitus. Therefore policy makers should increase tax on all consumeable fast foods, to promote public health. People usually shun away from foods that are highly taxable. For instance, I have seen people who used to buy fries everyday during lunchtime but the time price for take away get exhobitantly high they resorted to packed lunchboxes with traditional foods which are rich in nutrients to promote overall wellbeing.
Furthermore, health education is the key to improved public wellness. Good eating habits should be emphasised at workplaces, churches or even on television and radios to cover a greater population. Obesity is the major worrisome health drawback, therefore people need to be taught about a good balanced diet and the benefits of maintaining a normal body mass index.
In addition, regular exercises proved to promote overall wellbeing. Taking a walk improves blood circulation, reduces anxiety and is good for the heart. It is cost effective and does not need one to travel to a centre. This can be done at a family level as it also promote bonding among members through interactions, as they take a walk and encourage each other.
However, construction of a sport centre assist in promoting good health to the public. People meet and encourage one another and it is also a way of socialising, as well as meeting new friends.
To sumup, there are more cost effective methods of promoting public well being, than spending huge sums of money to construct a facility. Use of gadgets at these facilities can lead to accidental injuries by machines and it also requires training personel who need to be paid. It is wise to encourage people to practise simple and affordable habits which can be done routinely.
- The graph below shows how prices of 'high-tech gadgets' changed over time in Somecountry. 61
- The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption. 56
- Life cycle of a frog 56
- Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. 78
- The first graph below shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013 and also the amount in tonnes of fertiliser used The second graph shows the volome of rainfall in each month in millilitres 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omote peoples well being is by providing more exercise facilities, while some arg...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods cause a rise in conditions; such as, heart disease and diabetes mellitus. The...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
..., heart disease and diabetes mellitus. Therefore policy makers should increase tax on al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... have seen people who used to buy fries everyday during lunchtime but the time price for...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09383378016 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7449181819 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597855227882 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.316435428 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180331445985 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592215634707 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639997660559 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10006839488 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481968712558 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.