the graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030
The line graph presents and predicts the amount of oil consumed daily in barrels by the US, Western Europe and Japan, china, as well as the Middle East in term of the number of daily barrels during the period of twenty-two years starting in 2009.
Overall, from 2015, the amount of oil consumed by the US and China is expected to increase while that of Western Europe and Japan and the Middle East will decrease significantly. It is also clear that the US will remain the major consumer of all four areas throughout the years.
In 2009, almost 10 million barrels per day was consumed per day by the US. The figures were considerably lower for Western Europe and Japan at 4 million, and China and the Middle East at 2 million each. From 2009 to 2015, while the consumptions remained consistently in the US and declined gradually to approximately 3 million in Western Europe and Japan, they the data shared a similar upward trend in other areas with 2.8 million and 2.1 million for china and the middle of east respectively.
Afterwards, the US is predicted to experience the most dramatic fall to nearly 4 million barrels in 2030. Besides some fluctuations, the figures for china and the Middle East are predicted to rise to nearly 3 million compared with a steady fall to only 2 million by 2030 in Western Europe and Japan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Guri473812 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | vonhuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | dinhthu05 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | shubham0708 | 78 | view |
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basic. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time. 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- NEW TECHNOLOGY HAVE CHANGED THE WAY CHILDREN SPEND THEIR FREE TIME. DO THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES? 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 92
- the graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69787234043 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56597508903 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48085106383 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.6457212609 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107850431631 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057272289878 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357669075436 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782781314148 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291200302515 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.