Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss these points of view. What is your opinion?
In recent time, technological advancement has revolutionized humans’ lifestyle. Some individuals argue that the available variety of modern technology has to raise the gap between poor persons and wealthy individuals however, others believe that it has a reverse action. I shall discuss both the perspectives and explain why this technology make a wider gap between poorer and richer.
On the one hand, technology has given us many benefits. Firstly, poor people can get an education easily with the development of technology. To illustrates this, the internet provides a plethora of education free websites and applications, from that poor student can access to gain knowledge of the particular field and make future bright. For example, applications such as Udemy, Coursera provide free lectures or at low-cost fees to attend online classes and also, they provide officials course completion certificate. Secondly, after the invention of mobile phones and the computer rural area are becoming part of the global village and they can communicate all over the world with the access of the internet. In these ways, technological development has played widely to poor people.
On the other hand, others believed that the rich have more beneficial to have modern science. Firstly, rich persons have gotten the most effective treatments of disease with the help of modern types of machinery. To concrete that, there are many diseases like cancer, heart transplants and many more which are very expensive to treat by advanced medical machineries, it can only affordable for wealthy persons. For example, Indian cricketer Yuvraj Singh is one of the wealthy sportsmen who had a cancer disease and treated by modern laser technology. Secondly, more luxurious goods produced by different companies, rich persons have more choice of buying those items. For example, recently a car company tesla produces a driverless car that runs on the internet and sensors, its price is 75 lakhs rupees so only rich personalities can buy this vehicle.
To conclude, that modern science improved the lifestyle of both the personalities however, with wealthy financial conditions have access to a more luxurious and healthier lifestyle. In my opinion, recent technology has increased the gap between poor and rich.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-03 | dhruv j patel | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | khanhbang | 84 | view |
- The only way to improve the safety on our own roads is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 100
- Some people say that subjects like arts, music, drama and creative writing are more beneficial to children and therefore they need more of these subjects to be included in the timetable. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out. In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 56
- Some people think it is more important to spend time developing a successful career while others think it is more important to spend time with friends and family. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between poor people and rich people Others think it is having an opposite effect Discuss these points of view What is your opinion 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40947075209 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86984061118 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576601671309 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7588649054 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.235294118 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231737728699 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813036662911 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897700710324 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147027089832 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620823100503 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.