If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?
A. riding bicycle or walking on foot
B. recycling the waste
C. buys local organic food.
Nowadays, people must participate in plans city because these programs cause them to have a heartier and better society. In the last years, governments have created various methods which each one of them can have a positive effect on the world. In my opinion, people should do work that is easy for them, because some tasks have problems for people. So I think that riding a bicycle or hiking is the best form that people can help their society by it. I will address the most discernible reasons why I feel this way in the following essay.
To begin with, modern cities have high pollution, so this condition causes their health is in danger. The best way is to use the bicycle instead of personal car because in this manner we can control city pollution. The car produces a lot of gases that all of them have chemical substances which are noxious for people. When people try to use the bicycle the contamination rate is reduced because people's cars are in their garages, therefore, there is no reason the city has dirty air. As a result, people can functionally contribute to society.
Secondly, these days people use their cars which they have an inhospitable effect on their body in the future. One of the ways that people can use is walking on foot. This style in the long-term has an affirmative on their health. It is believed by researchers that people should daily walk on foot because it can improve the health of their bones. Moreover, daily walking influences on the nervous system, thus people have a calm spirit. If everyone follows this way, society will have healthy population that it is perfect for any government. This condition is very good for society because one clean society has more power than other countries that have not this situation. As you can see, people have a big impact on society, because one society is formed with people. Consequently, people's participation enhances society.
Third, I disagree with recycling the waste, because it takes a lot of time, while in modern society people are busy and have not enough time to do this work. Thus, this way is not a good idea. In addition, the government suggests that people to buy organic foods, but these foods are expensive, so people cannot but local organic food. As a result, this statement is not practical.
In conclusion, taking all the reasons and examples into account, I believe that people can help the society by a simple way and it is riding a bicycle or hiking. These ways compare to other methods are more useful for people who want to contribute to the society
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | NIMA SAEEDI | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. Fires in Yellowstone park 80
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, while, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74107142857 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48239074912 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8557254981 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.96 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.92 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259287004974 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081474802165 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632009882744 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161432225553 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283314687281 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.