Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage.
Sending human to Mars
The reading and lecture are both about sending humans to Mars that before doing this work some problems should solve by experts. The author of reading believes that some problems cause this project is not practical. The lecture challenges the statements made by the author. Professor is of the opinion that these problems can solve by some strategies.
First of all, the author suggests that rounding trips to Mars does needs essential substances, but it is impossible because the spacecraft has a little space. This problem is challenged by the lecture. She says that astronauts can use the hydroponic method because this way solves their problem. Furthermore, he argues that in this system plants grow in water instead of soil, so astronauts can cultivate plant crops in the spacecraft. Moreover, these plants absorb carbon dioxide then release fresh oxygen. Therefore astronauts have fresh air.
Secondly, the writer contends that astronauts cannot be in zero-gravity environments for a long time. The article notes zero-gravity space cause reduces muscle mass and bone density. The article, however, rebuts this by asserting that astronauts can exercise in the space station. She elaborates on this by mentioning that this manner helps to prevent decreasing muscle. In addition, they can take minerals like calcium which has a positive effect on bone density.
Finally, it is stated in the article that Mars has harmful space radiation, also the magnetic field in the interplanetary space not be able to protect them in the face of the radiation. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that the sun has occasionally detrimental radiation. Professor says that to avoid this event the spacecraft can equip with an instrument that monitors solar radiations and he mentions that spacecraft can have small shield. As a result, when solar radiations are no in the space astronauts stay in unshielded capacity and when solar radiations detected by instruments they can wait in the shielded area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
- sdasd 3
- what is the source of the sound? 80
- Do you agree or disagree?It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise 76
- There is some theories about the agnostides which had been extincted 450millions years ago. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Universities should give the same amount of money to their student’s sports activities as they give to their university libraries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ms cause this project is not practical. The lecture challenges the statements made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rbon dioxide then release fresh oxygen. Therefore astronauts have fresh air. Secondly, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 488, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... As a result, when solar radiations are no in the space astronauts stay in unshiel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25625 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73786384568 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565625 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0517951276 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5263157895 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15789473684 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0821960395574 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274688733801 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339770249189 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517273879332 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310172531478 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.