The table gives information about consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002
The table compares the proportion of consumer expenditure 3 categories of items in 5 different countries in 2002. Overall, food/drinks/Tobacco registered the highest data among all countries, with the highest choice in Turkey. While leisure and education were the least paid attention to the proportion of their total expenditure by this group.
Regarding /drinks/tobacco, Turkey holds the lion’s share of 32.14% in the percentage of consumer spending, followed by the figure for Ireland, at 28.19%. Meanwhile, the rate of income in Sweden paid out for Food/drinks/tobacco was 15.77%, by half in this data for Turkey. In particular, clothing and footwear accounted for a minority of 5.4% in Sweden’s consumer spending, as opposed to the figure for Italy, at 9%.
In terms of leisure/education, it is also mostly chosen by Turkey people, at 4.35%, which is higher than that of other countries. Surprisingly, the same number is recorded for Italy and Sweden, at 3.2% and 3.22%, respectively. Meanwhile, a similar pattern was witnessed in the data for Ireland and Spain, at 2.2 % and 1.98%, in that order.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | Zoe-Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | BaoMinhTu | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | Oanhlucy | view | |
| 2019-12-12 | Lê Thị Hà | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different nations in 2002 84
- Visitors in England 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.https://www.ielts-mentor.com/writing-sam 11
- The table shows expenditures of 4 car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 73
- The table gives information about consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wear accounted for a minority of 5.4% in Sweden's consumer spending, as oppo...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isingly, the same number is recorded for Italy and Sweden, at 3.2% and 3.22%, res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34090909091 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43908658568 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.336363386 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899735283533 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530752589586 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124939069362 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674767288702 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732741164375 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.