The diagram below shows the number of landline telephone per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.
The bar chart illustrates that number of landline telephone users in different 9 countries between 2000 to 2004. Overall, people lived in Singapore who were highest users of telephone. However, Indonesia, lao pdr and Thailand have lowest owner of landline.
Firstly, Singapore' population have biggest ownership of telephone in 2000 with 480 per 1000 people. Whereas in following year it fall to 460 per 1000 people and ever further went down in 2004 with 380 per 1000 people. Brunei had second largest utilizer of telephone, In which 250 per 1000 people in 2000 year and nearly same in next two years but upto 2004 it went down to the 230 per 1000 people. Moreover, Cambodia and Vietnam have same pattern because both same telephone uses in 2000 around 30 per 1000 people, And after 4 years both have telephone nearly 50 per 1000 people. In addition, Indonesia, Lao pdr and Thailand have lowest owner of telephone because in upto 2004 landline users vanished. Lastly, Myanmar also consider as a bottom because in five years of time the growth was negligible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | sivasankar | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | ps777777777777777 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jeheb | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the number of landline telephone per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period. 61
- Technological developments in earlier time brought more changes to the life of ordinary people then recent technological developments have brought do you agree or disagree with this statements. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the highest'.
Suggestion: were the highest
... Overall, people lived in Singapore who were highest users of telephone. However, Indonesia,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the lowest'.
Suggestion: have the lowest
...owever, Indonesia, lao pdr and Thailand have lowest owner of landline. Firstly, Singapore...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the biggest'.
Suggestion: have the biggest
...ndline. Firstly, Singapore population have biggest ownership of telephone in 2000 with 480...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'falls'?
Suggestion: falls
...00 people. Whereas in following year it fall to 460 per 1000 people and ever further...
^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'patterned'.
Suggestion: patterned
...oreover, Cambodia and Vietnam have same pattern because both same telephone uses in 200...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people. In addition, Indonesia, Lao pdr and Thailand have lowest owner of teleph...
^^
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the lowest'.
Suggestion: have the lowest
...ition, Indonesia, Lao pdr and Thailand have lowest owner of telephone because in upto 2004...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89444444444 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43505773501 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8681924575 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303289035668 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124168449416 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750713881691 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21521298305 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527463143946 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.