The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 to 2010.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 to 2010.

The pie charts explain the percentages of the British students at one university in England who are able to understand any languages and english by 2000 and 2010. It seen that student has risen slightly increase learning a language. Between 2000 until 2010 the processing of the languages that no significant increase or decrease, it seems that in one decades the progressing so slow.

From 2000 to 2010, the british peers be able to speak another languages was increased steadily in 5% such as Spanish, Another Language, and Two Other Languages. In other hand, during 10 years the British student were learned German language steadily in 10%, there are no any changes year by year it seems that the student were no have big interest with German language.

Furthermore, the whole of percentages it shows that only No Other Language was small fall from one-fifth to one in ten. Also, Another Language was small dropped one in twenty.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 ppatel 73 view
2020-01-07 Duong Linh 61 view
2019-12-24 nguyentuananh76 67 view
2019-12-17 Jesslynindah 84 view
2019-12-01 Gre user 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one decade', 'a decade', or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: one decade; a decade; decades
... increase or decrease, it seems that in one decades the progressing so slow. From 200...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...man language steadily in 10%, there are no any changes year by year it seems that ...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'changes'' or 'change's'?
Suggestion: changes'; change's
...guage steadily in 10%, there are no any changes year by year it seems that the student ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98734177215 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58424007153 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588607594937 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5512469819 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410507235479 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182811168064 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147021141917 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258502513981 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100499975915 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.