The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
The bar chart compares 10 highest-ranking countries in terms of electricity generation and consumption in 2014
Looking at the graph,it is immediately obvious that the amount of electricity were produced and consumed in China and the US were higher than the other nations. It is also noticeable that Germany was the only country having the consumed more electricity than it generated.
Out of the 10 nations, China ranked first with the production and consumption of electricity being just over 5,300 billion kWh each. The next is the US, the area stood the second largest electricity producer and consumer, made 4,099 billion kWh and used 3,866 billion kWh.
Towards the remained countries, Russia was the only nation having two arrays above 1,000 billion kWh, followed by Japan and India, with the figures being slightly lower, fluctuation from 698,8 to 936,2 billion kWh. The figures for other countries witnessed a difference in production and consumption of electricity at around 50-150 billion kWh. Meanwhile, Germany just manufactured 526,6 billion kWh of electricity, but it consumed 582,5 billion kWh.
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in di erent occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 78
- The maps below show information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 73
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organisation rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 57
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...nsumption in 2014 Looking at the graph,it is immediately obvious that the amount ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38285714286 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84933791092 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 192.238133574 43.030603864 447% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 235.5 112.824112599 209% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.75 22.9334400587 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185928381447 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126598774681 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540610559838 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147559403146 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109004120326 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.8 13.2329268293 195% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.3012195122 183% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.