The chart below gives information about how commuters travelled to work in one city in Newzealand.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the ratio of people in the Newzealand using what type of transport in a city.
The one mode transport is dramatically decreased in 2006 compared to 1996 and remaining are increased.
In 1996 private car or truck had been used by 50 percent of commuters. In contrast, in 2006 it owned only 10%. Train, motorcycle, and others are pretty much same leve in both the years. On the other hand, company vehicle, worked at home has same persent as 9 in 1996 and it has been up rised as 51% in 2006. In 1996 the bicycle, public bus, and walked or jogged are a bit low in ratio compared the above as 9%, 8%, and 7% respectively. In opposite, the chart shows these commuter had been faced a hike roughly 5 times in 2006.
Overall, it is so clear that than private car or truck every mode of transport had zenith in 2660, people in Newzealand prefered private car or truck only in 1996.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | anantha annamalai | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best teacher is one who is very knowledgeable about the subject matter. 56
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don't need and can't afford.What are the reasons for this behaviour?What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 78
- The chart below gives information about how commuters travelled to work in one city in Newzealand Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
Comments
The information you share is…
The information you share is very good and interesting, and thanks to that, I know more useful things. Keep posting interesting things slope and I will keep an eye on your posts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 466, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this commuter' or 'these commuters'?
Suggestion: this commuter; these commuters
...pectively. In opposite, the chart shows these commuter had been faced a hike roughly 5 times i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46107784431 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47158182109 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1825166488 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7777777778 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0559118950037 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023940944146 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261176827138 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.039765073691 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185317000824 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.