Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in the field.
Everyday people are leaving comments and opinions on blog articles, photos, videos and many other contents. These comments, most of the time can work as the feedback of users to the owner of the content. They may be critical, appreciative or suggesting improvements that will help creator to ameliorate and deliver the best. Here author of statement posits that if critical judgement does not come from the person who is an expert in that particular area it has little value. I do not completely agree with the statement as it is too general to be true in all the situations of the real world.
Humanity has a gift to understand the world better than any other species on the planet and with that understanding humans has also ability to decide and have an opinion on what is best and what is not. People often have opinions about politicians, celebrities, sports person, artists, food items and many others. Not all the time things are complex like quantum mechanics, in fact many of the times it is just matter of common sense and just a little bit of conventional knowledge. A parent who overcame economic problems would have experience that certainly can be very useful for his child to avoid possibly making huge mistake and the parent doesn’t have to be an expert to do so.
There are cases in which critical judgement of majority people with similar opinion towards something should not be discarded as worthless only on the base that they are not the experts in the area. For an example of music production producing creative and one of its kind which may be a good and sound business strategy for business company. But it happens to be that fans and customers of that music production criticizes it for what it is and production needs to take this criticism as a feedback for upcoming albums and songs. They won’t agree with the fact that those criticism has no value because those customers may not be experts. The same for a good business it is that knowing customers’ dissatisfaction helps better to improve the product.
However, more often than not people have bias about any other person or thing. Many times perspective of people and that bias dominates over seeing facts clearly and they tend to make decisions based on that. It can be said that there are many strong opinions on recent demoneytization policy led by Mr Narendra Modi, prime minister of India. Many of them think that it was a good decision in try to wipe out black money and other think that it was a huge mistake which led to many problems with steep economic slowdown. But as many of these are opinions of common people and they most probably don’t know how macroeconomics operate and why it wasn’t successful because of may be lack of seeing facts clearly and not have access to all the facts necessary. Therefore they cannot add any value to provide the correct explanation.
In the conclusion, may be sometimes there is not needed to be an expert to present an opinion about something and also in many areas like business and art industry criticism of people who are not experts in the field add significant value. And it is also true that in the complex matters like macro-economics only an expert can truly give something valuable and useful advice. So the statement should be flexible enough to include these points.
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of just accepting it passively. 80
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."The population on Balmer Island doubles during the summer months. During the summer, then, the town council of Balmer Island should decrease the maximum number of moped re 42
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's school. 66
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 66
- Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in the field. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... just matter of common sense and just a little bit of conventional knowledge. A parent who...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 549, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...oming albums and songs. They won't agree with the fact that those criticism has no value because th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 574, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this criticism' or 'those criticisms'?
Suggestion: this criticism; those criticisms
...hey won't agree with the fact that those criticism has no value because those customers ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...s about any other person or thing. Many times perspective of people and that bias dom...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 769, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...have access to all the facts necessary. Therefore they cannot add any value to provide th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e statement should be flexible enough to include these points.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2783.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 578.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81487889273 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90322654589 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65458143604 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468858131488 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6716629687 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1304347826 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21739130435 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16479667431 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470190509921 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706070578311 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999474735113 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515981277804 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.