Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in the field

[ August 18, 2023 7:51 PM ] ⁨Anil K C⁩: “Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.”

No field in this world are free from problems, and to solve these problems some kind of critical judgements are required. And to solve those problems we need expert, but having expert doesnt mean it will be solved.According to the prompts the critical judgement of work will be futile or has little value unless it comes from someone who is expert in that field. And I mostly disgree with this with these following two reasons.

To begin, fundamental reason behind this dissent is that none is one hundred perccent perfect and one man cannot own expertise on diverse field. Any work in filed is not isolated, it is related with many oher apect. For instance, In any civil engineering work such as hydropower,If turbine fails to work properly then expert of turbin appears and tries to solve, it is unlikely to solve becasue we should consider other factors too like eeletrical problems and single turbine expert cannot solve that problem. Also ignoring management aspect, we cannot totally rely on the technical expert. Thus, above example illustrates that any work contains network of multiple aspect so depending on single expert is totally absurd.

Secondly, Other than expert also can solve the problems. For instance, in chess, In an interview the world champion Magnus carlson was given to solve the puzzle regarding the chess but he tried for like 10 minutes but he couldnit figure out the solutions. But an amature of elo 1100 solved that puzzle. So Critical judgement is not always come from expert, we can espect it from the amature. Also we can recall the history of war in Nepal where the critical judgement taken by different politician were failed and made the economics worse. Also from Nepal, The insurgency from Maoist led deaths of 17000 innocent people, which was totally absurd and irrational critical judgement from so callled expert in politics. So From these examples we can get gist that expert always cannot solve the problems.

But, Some argue that, Mainly in teaching subjects, we need the expert to solve problems. Yes we can concede these argument. Some math problems, physics problems required expert to solve those conondrum. But for those solved problem to bring into reality we need another manpower. So as already mentioned single an expert is not enought for the solving the problem, we can conclude that we should consider all the avaliable worker to extract the solution rather than depending on single expert in that field.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space after the opening parenthesis
Suggestion: [
[ August 18, 2023 7:51 PM ] ⁨Anil K C⁩: “C...
^^
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
Suggestion: ]
[ August 18, 2023 7:51 PM ] ⁨Anil K C⁩: “Critical judgment of work ...
^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...blems we need expert, but having expert doesnt mean it will be solved.According to th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expert, but having expert doesnt mean it will be solved.According to the prompts ...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
...g expert doesnt mean it will be solved.According to the prompts the critical judgement o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e prompts the critical judgement of work will be futile or has little value unles...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this with these following two reasons. To begin, fundamental reason behind this...
^^^
Line 6, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , If
...ivil engineering work such as hydropower,If turbine fails to work properly then exp...
^^^
Line 6, column 511, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rbine expert cannot solve that problem. Also ignoring management aspect, we cannot t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 706, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... aspect so depending on single expert is totally absurd. Secondly, Other than ...
^^
Line 8, column 393, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ert, we can espect it from the amature. Also we can recall the history of war in Nep...
^^^^
Line 8, column 541, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...re failed and made the economics worse. Also from Nepal, The insurgency from Maoist ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...But, Some argue that, Mainly in teaching subjects, we need the expert to solve pr...
^^
Line 10, column 110, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
...t to solve problems. Yes we can concede these argument. Some math problems, physics problems r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as to, for instance, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97742663657 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44708267318 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52144469526 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8689395197 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.15 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399684519671 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115413522756 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154476377667 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304014430237 0.150359130593 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222634334084 0.0667264976115 334% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.