The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summaries the information by seclecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrated the main indicators why productiveness of agriculture land decrease in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s. The region decreased total square of farming the most is Europe by 23%, 13% of decline for Oceania and the less with 5% in North America. Firstly, In Europe, the main reason of farming land becomes less productive is deforestation with 9.8%, over-cultivation also cause 7.7% of land degradation and over-grazing impacts the less to agriculture land in 5.5%. Secondly, the main cause lead to decrease square of farming land in Oceania relates to over-grazing, deforestation makes decrease by 1.7% of land degradation but agriculture land in here is not affected by over- cultivation. Finally, the opposite with Oceania, over-cultivation is the main cause of land degradation by over-cultivation by 3.3% in North America, deforestation is the less impact to cut productivity of agriculture land only 0.2%, 1.5% of over-grazing is the cause of land degradation.
- What are the pros and cons of using public transportation? 61
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television? 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summaries the information by seclecting and reporting the main features, and ma 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 2001.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...se in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s. The region decreased total square of f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 982, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2%, 1.5% of over-grazing is the cause of land degradation.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36942675159 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45910894642 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471337579618 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4393113728 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225405417178 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152108378359 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628357543363 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225405417178 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.