Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research
and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on
television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in the world. These
television appearances are of great benefit to the professors themselves as well as to their
universities and the general public.
Professors benefit from appearing on television because by doing so acquire reputations as
authorities in their academic fields among a much wider audience than they have on
campus. If a professor publishes views in an academic journal, only other scholars will learn
about and appreciate those views. But when a professor appears on TV, thousands of
people outside the narrow academic community become aware of the professor’s ideas. So
when professors share their ideas with a television audience, the professors’ importance as
scholars is enhanced.
Universities also benefit from such appearances. The universities receive positive publicity
when their professors appear on TV. When people see a knowledgeable faculty member of a
university on television, they think more highly of that university. That then leads to an
improved reputation for the university. And that improved reputation in turn leads to more
donations for the university and more applications from potential students.
Finally, the public gains from professors’ appearing on television. Most television viewers
normally have no contact with university professors. When professors appear on television,
viewers have a chance to learn from experts and to be exposed to views they might
otherwise never hear about. Television is generally a medium for commentary that tends to
be superficial, not deep or thoughtful. From professors on television, by contrast, viewers get
a taste of real expertise and insight.
The reading and the lecture are both about the television appearances of professors. The author of the reading feels that appearances benefit the professors themselves as well as to their universities and the general public. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that Television appearance will harm the reputation of Professors.
To begin with, the author argues that, by appearing in the Television program,professors acquire reputations in their authorities' field. The article mentions that when professor appears on TV, thousands of people outside the academic community become aware of the professor's ideas; howbeit, this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer; he claims that such appearances harm the professor's reputation. He says that the academic filed thinks that such professors are not serious as well also not educated in their field.
Secondly, the author argues that universities are also benefited from such appearance. In the article, it is said that the universities receive positive publicity when their professors appear on tv. Nevertheless, the lecturer is of the opinion that such appearance harms the reputation of professors as well as their universities. These professors are not invited to the academic conference. He feels that such appearance will consume a lot of times of professors related to how to look and what to say in front of the audience that they did not get the time to focus on research.
Finally, The author posits that such appearances benefit the public gain; he believes that when professors appear on TV, viewers have a chance to learn from experts. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that Tv broadcasters are not interested in providing in-depth knowledge of academic prompt to the general public. He thinks that TV broadcasters only show the prompt of academics and not the analysis of said promptly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Rupak | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Manu2525 | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Manu2525 | 71 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Amey Waghmode | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | ajinkyagadgil | 73 | view |
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 60
- The extended family( grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than in the past. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 66
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America's west coast from California to Alaska. A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns beca 73
- Broken window theory 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s well as to their universities and the general public. The lecturer challenges the claim made...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ir universities and the general public. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , professors
..., by appearing in the Television program,professors acquire reputations in their authoritie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mentions that when professor appears on TV, thousands of people outside the acad...
^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...e claims that such appearances harm the professors reputation. He says that the academic f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 306, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...pth knowledge of academic prompt to the general public. He thinks that TV broadcasters only sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31907894737 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01367497287 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453947368421 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6426033008 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162625141069 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701896220396 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365953777552 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116313859324 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426211785457 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.