The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.
The given line graph depicts what proportion of four various age group went to cinema in the United Kingdom within the period of two decades (from 1990 to 2010).
A quick glance at the line graph is quite enough to make it clear that the similar pattern was followed through the entire four age groups. However, older age group 44-54 remained at top place throughout the 20 years.
In the analisation of cinema attendance in the UK, youngsters 14-24 and adults between 34 and 44 were stood at first rank with analogous percentum that was approximately more than one third. At the same time, 24-34 and 44-54 age group were contributed nearly quarter and one fifth of the total cinema attendance consecutively. All the four group were going in the direction of sky before attaining the lowest percentage in 2000.
Moving further, in the first five years of 21st century, whole four age groups 14-24, 24-34, 34-44 and 44-54 were climbing towards the highest point. Although, there was marginal increment in age group 44-54 in 2010, age group 34-44 had touched the peak with one third. On the other hand, age group 14-24 and 24-34 got top two positions by crossing two fifth of the entire cinema attendance in 2010.
- In many countries people tend to move overseas or move to a different part of their country after their retirement Discuss why they do so and what the outcome of this sitation is 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 73
- The bar chart gives the top eight online activities in Slovakia in a given month 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriod of two decades from 1990 to 2010. A quick glance at the line graph is quit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79047619048 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33566938455 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8992788281 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117995833649 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579528514907 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540531487298 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873639957022 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399729856034 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.