It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that thanks to technology development people can visit remote natural areas. The following essay will clarify both sides of the coin, and demonstrate my view that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that traveling to intact areas has some disadvantages for both people and nature. First and foremost, the ecosystem of those areas can be ruined by humans. For example, people who travel to the South Pole need some devices to get warm so that they unintentionally cause Ice Mountains to start melting. As a result, not only does it increase global warming, but also it has negative effects on animal’s life living there. Besides, discovering, visiting, and studying new areas may cost people a lot, while there are many other fields like the education system that both government and people can spend their money and time on them rather than traveling to remote natural areas.
On the other hand, although traveling to remote areas has more and more disadvantages, it could have a few benefits to reap. First of all, in some areas like the South Pole, there are many creatures near extinction that scientists can help them in terms of breading to stop their extinction. Moreover, traveling to intact areas creates a window of opportunity for people, especially the rich, to have an unforgettable experience. For instance, living in an igloo for a few days is really exciting.
To conclude, traveling to intact areas has some advantages for both scientists and tourists though I incline that its drawbacks outweigh benefits.
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some students take a year off between school and university to work or to travel Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Although some people suggest a results-orientation method to encourage students, others would propose improvements as a vital criterion to reward students. In my personal view, the latter is more useful. 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, really, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06896551724 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76393166918 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578544061303 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3392015142 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228070984259 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809382376104 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573512763941 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147911547411 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410364395639 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.