The pie chart below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three
countries.
The diagrams provided illustrate the information about the methods of three nations (the Republic of Korea, The United Kingdom and Sweden) deal with hazardous garbage.
At a glance, it is evident that the majority of methods utilized to dispose of the dangerous waste products is buried underground. Besides, Great britain is the sole country using chemical substances to dealt with the garbage.
In South Korea, more than two-thirds of hazardous waste is recycled, followed by 22% buried method. Also, just a small quantity of the waste is dealt with burning way. In contrast, 55% of Sweden's garbage is disposed of using the underground way, while two other methods (recycling and burning) shared almost similar figure (25% and 20% respectively).
Up to 82% of hazardous garbage in britain is disposed using the underground method, followed by chemical treatment and throwing to the sea as at the second place (8% each) and just 2% of the waste is dealt using incineration.
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the whole world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- In order to learn a language well we should learn about the country as well as the cultures and lifestyles of the people who speak it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1572327044 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73041461268 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7337990628 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15159928044 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082904080777 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598466805259 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969458635606 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577409803852 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.