Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. the source of quackers
The reading and lecture are both about quackers, which started in the 1960s and then stopped in the 1980s. The author of reading believes that there are some theories that can show sources of the sound. The lecture challenges the theories made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these reasons are wrong.
First of all, the author suggests that the strange noises were related to the male and female orca whales, which alive in the areas where the submarines were picking up the sounds. This hypothesis is challenged by the lecture. She says that the orca whales settle in the area where the submarines heard the noises, but most of them live near the surface of the water while the submarines are in the deep zone, so the submarines could not hear whales' voices.
Secondly, the writer contends that the sounds were made by giant squids because they have complex brains, which can send sounds into the environment. Also, the article notes the sonar system cannot recognize giant squids because they are creatures that have no skeleton in the body. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that the submarines detected the noises between two decades, and after that, the sounds disappeared. She elaborates on this by mentioning that giant squids have lived in the area until now, consequently, there is no rational reason that these animals were started to send the noise at the specific time and suddenly stop it.
Finally, it is stated in the article that Russian submarines were catching the sounds from foreign submarines that were patrolling the area, moreover, other submarines designed by specific apparatus that were undetectable by sonar. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that this statement has a problem because the source of sound appear to move and change direction very fast, whereas the submarines cannot do this work. Besides, she mentions that even today there are no submarines that can move and change a route quickly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. Problems for sending human to MArs 83
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The job has a greater effect on one's overall happiness than the social life does. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement grades encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 40
- Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage. The cane toads population 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ies that can show sources of the sound. The lecture challenges the theories made by...
^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lenges the theories made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98181818182 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36964271813 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5046937013 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803550406409 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354018320358 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325599897539 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531653075068 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322194498923 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.