the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999

The presented table gives information about the percentage of people from different family types living in poverty in Australia in the year of 1999.

Overall, from between all families' types, the sole parent is the one who has more people in poverty, while the least of them belongs to the aged couple.

The categories of families who have the most critical financer situation are the sole parent with 21%, following by the single with no children category which represents 19%, and 12% for the couple with children (which is 933000 people).

The types of families who have a better living situation comparing with the previous categories are the couple with no children with 7% and the single aged following by age couples are the least mean families (6% and 4% respectively ). Looking at all households, 11% of them, which is 1837000 of people are living in an unfortunate situation.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (13 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ast mean families 6% and 4% respectively . Looking at all households, 11% of them,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 741.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97315436242 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56912436445 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563758389262 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9564519958 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.2 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215549297832 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126917327002 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121715986137 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149223055129 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127564670672 0.0819641961636 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.