Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Some people think that students can learn effectively when they conduct a project alone. However, I believe that when teachers assign projects that students must work each other, the students learn more effectively. This is because a team project broadens student's perspective and increases the motivation of student.
First of all, assigning projects that students must work together broadens student’s perspective which make them to learn more effectively. Understanding a property of team projects is necessary to substantiate this view. A team consists of team members who have different background, so students can share various opinions about a topic, which enables them to broaden perspective. For example, one of my friends had a team project to make a coffee machine. He was interested in machine and had a lot of knowledge about engineering. He focused only the efficiency of machine, however other team member who like to design suggested an opinion that it is also important to consider the design of the machine. Consequently, they made a powerful coffee machine with beautiful design. My friend stated that he could get broaden perspective about design through the team project. In this regard, the team project enables student to broaden their perspectives.
Moreover, assigning projects that students should work together increase the motivation of students, which ultimately enables them to learn more effectively. It is important to recognize the fact that the motivation is significant source for effective learning. One of my experiences demonstrates this point of view. For instance, I got a team project which required to develop a Hyundai Motor's business strategy. Since the political condition and the company's R&D ability was somewhat vague, it was really difficult. I just wanted to give up, but my team members encouraged and motivated me. Consequently, I did not give up, and we could make a great output. If I worked alone, I would give up and I couldn't learn anything. In this regard, team projects increase the motivation of students.
To sum up, I believe that when teacher assign a team project, the students learn much more effectively for the following reasons : to broaden perspective and to increase the motivation. Consequently, the importance of my view cannot be underestimated for the reasons that I have mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Some companies provide important products, but also damage the environment. Some people believe that the government should require more penalties, higher taxes, and larger fines of these companies, while others believe that there are better ways. Which on 66
- University freshmen do not know much about university life and learning. There are two ways to help freshmen quickly enter university life, choose a method that you feel is better and explain why.1) attending a one-week orientation or introduction program 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 63
- kim jung un 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 702, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...f I worked alone, I would give up and I couldnt learn anything. In this regard, team pr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.368 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01476931642 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9578516385 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5217391304 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3043478261 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292909643413 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095294663317 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120630385351 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23064771623 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116211717545 0.0645574589148 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.