It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary life, furnishing a large number of millennials with tertiary education has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend triggers some detrimental implications, its benefits will be far more significant.

There are a variety of compelling reasons why offering a high proportion of teenagers opportunities to approach higher education system if of a dazzling advantage. First, since university is regarded as an academic learning environment, it helps students enrich their specialized knowledge. In fact, some complex jobs require a deeper understanding of the fundamental theories and the nature of subjects. Therefore, the more likely teenagers are to step into universities, the higher chances they have for decent jobs and handsome salaries. Second, by taking part in university life, youngsters are able to boost their skills such as problem-solving, discussion and teamwork. Simultaneously, their soft skills such as communicative, and logical skills are also significantly enhanced , which paves the way for them in workplace later on.

That something is welcomed is reinforced by more supporting evidences below. Third, in order to heighten our intellect, more and more young people should attend university once in their lifetime. Governments should adopt such holistic approaches to tackle the high unemployment rates. For example, American local authorities are inclined to offer more scholarships for international students and widen the scope of studying abroad, which helps the students get exposed to a better education system. Last but not least, it is of paramount importance for young people to improve their social network with teachers and friends. By doing so, they are inclined to avoid being isolated, which in turn helps them build up a diverse job network.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that it makes more sense for governments of every country to encourage millennials to maintain their education path to university. Only when concerted endeavors are made in terms of education can the prospect of an educated society be visible.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-29 Nyahmeo 67 view
2023-06-29 quynhanhbuiviet 67 view
2023-06-29 quynhanhbuiviet 67 view
2023-06-29 quynhanhbuiviet 67 view
2023-06-29 quynhanhbuiviet 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
In contemporary life, furnishing a large number of millennials with tertiary education has...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...discussion and teamwork. Simultaneously, their soft skills such as communicative,...
^^
Line 5, column 785, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l skills are also significantly enhanced , which paves the way for them in workpla...
^^
Line 13, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducation can the prospect of an educated society be visible.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.615625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13849902716 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640625 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4330440099 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130580707606 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383104064983 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324886306564 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675072676716 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453257131417 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.