The chart give information about the percentage of the world’s forest and timber in five different regions.
The charts illustrate the proportion of the forest of the world and the amount of timber in five diverse regions.
The first pie chart gives out data about the percentage of world forest in five varied areas. North America makes up one fourth of the total world’s forest, stands behind Africa with 2% lesser. The figure for Europe, South America and Asia witnesses a stabilization around 20% with 18%, 16% and 14% correspondingly.
However, the data for the percentage of timber in each region demonstrates differs from its figure for the world’s forest. Africa experiences a dramatic divergence from its above data with nearly one tenth of the total field. And North America reaches 1st position in the number of timber with 30%. Three remaining sectors remains its maintenance with little variation, from 18% to 23% of Asia, Europe and South America.
It is conspicuous that regions with high percentage of forest customarily goes along with high data for the timber in each places, apart from Africa.
- artists 78
- The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 73
- freedom of speech of artists. 78
- Cocoa bean production 84
- The chart give information about the percentage of the world s forest and timber in five different regions 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17964071856 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67894314006 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.7578633026 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314583288908 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145927544084 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15067989386 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220885126729 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111796678272 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.