Some people believe that television is a powerful educational tool. Other people believe that television is nothing more than mindless entertainment and should be discouraged.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, watching televisions are set to play a larger part in people's daily lives than ever. there has been a perception that tv could not perform the function as an education tool but rather than a wasteful entertaininment. This view is open to debate.
On the bright side, television has played the function of a supportive and reinforcement device. it is working as an effective tool in education as it helps to accomplish the aims and objectives of education. Some people might argue that watching tv, a common leisure activity, has seriously hampered the viewers' development in various fields. Their argument is based on an assumption that tv watchers are passive when absorbing information presented by channels and respond with no active thinking. However, there is evidence that television progammes are becomming increasingly educational and instructive. For example, quiz shows encourages critical thinking, while educational channels, such as Discovery, broaden watchers' knowledge. Whild advertisments bear aesthetical and ideological values, talk shows display the art of languages.
On the contrary, it is believed that television is nothing but a senseless entertainment. Learning through traditional means of education is more well-known rather than gaining knowledge with the help of technology. For instance, reading a book and watching it on tv is not the same. The in-depth advertance that the tv provides is lacking in details.
In conclusion, people still prefer accquire knowledge through technology but it is not an alternative for written education. Therefore, conventional and technological knowledge both an equivalent role in the education system
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | my5901 | 30 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Nikhil Sharma | 92 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Nikhil Sharma | 71 | view |
- The diagram shows the process of producing smoked fish 73
- The chart give information about the percentage of the world s forest and timber in five different regions 87
- Cocoa bean production 84
- In some countries, small town-center shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out – of – town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out – of – town stores, and it may result in an increase in 84
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper will remain an important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... part in peoples daily lives than ever. there has been a perception that tv could not...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... a supportive and reinforcement device. it is working as an effective tool in educ...
^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...re activity, has seriously hampered the viewers development in various fields. Their ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 842, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alk shows display the art of languages. On the contrary, it is believed that tel...
^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the tv provides is lacking in details. In conclusion, people still prefer accqu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62204724409 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24073147679 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61811023622 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2551002932 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204687698377 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619999075965 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531036104127 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120308636514 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355247873192 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.