The charts below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the frequency with which people in the United States ate fast food between the years of 2003 and 2013.
Overall, people seem to enjoy eating at a fast food restaurant between once a week to once or twice a month. Going to a fast food joint daily or never seem like the least preferred options, although there’s a lot of fluctuation in the likeness of citizens.
In 2003, most people (about 31 percent) preferred to eat junk food once a week. Once or twice a month was closely behind, while going out every day was the least popular choice, just about 4 percent did that.
In 2006 the trends remained pretty much the same with about 33 percent preferring to eat out once a week. It was followed by once or twice a month. Similar to previous year, people didn’t like eating fast food every day, only about 3 percent chose that option.
2013 is an interesting year as it breaks the trend. The most preferred frequency was once or twice a month, which about 33 percent people chose. Although the preferences changed, the dislikes remained unchanged and only 3 percent would go out every day.
- The fist chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 56
- Today’s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.665 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4003958007 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8869386976 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8181818182 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.454545454545 5.23603664747 9% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132478010224 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643030280589 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766020169124 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104519343728 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842639730619 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.