The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph shows information from the research into how much Burnaby public Library’s books were read by male and female readers during the period 2011-2014. The units are measured in two groups of opposite genders.
Overall, according to the data, there was a growing tendency in the numbers books consumed by male members of the public whereas this number in female category experienced a decrease in the end of the period.
To be specific, there were just approximate 3000 books were read by male readers in 2011. However, after witnessed a slight increase in 2012, the number then upsurge rapidly for the rest of the period. Finally, when the survey was taken again in 2014, there were around 14000 books which were read by male readers.
Turning to the opposite gender, in 2011, there were about 5000 books borrowed from the Burnaby public Library by women members. This number rose gradually in the following years and reach its peak at 10000 of books borrowed. In the last year of the period taken survey, the number declined significantly by 2000 books.
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- In many places people s lifestyles are changing rapidly and this a ects family relationships Do you think the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 78
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 Unit is measured in million tons and the percent recycling on total trash produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1978021978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39530192667 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2717511137 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263531469715 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103338399962 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898459255796 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163072612822 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679336604614 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.