Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The Internet is perhaps one of the most important innovations that the last generations have ever witnessed. Nonetheless, there are divided opinions in relation to its effects. While some people defend the Internet as a tool that provides valuable information to its users, others argue that the big amounts of information that internet gives access to is quite problematic. Although I understand the second view, I strongly agree with the first opinion. That is, that the Internet provides people with very valuable information. To support this view, I would like to highlight two main reasons.
First, the Internet has completely changed the world of communications as we knew it. Not so long ago, the information we received was gathered, written and distributed from few news agencies deployed all over the world. Thanks to the different platforms to which we have access today, any individual can share information in real time. Importantly, this information comes from different sources and supports a wide variety of points of view. As someone who deeply cares about the environment, I found that the Internet has played an important role on the latest natural disasters. For instance, while the mainstream media still did not cover the wildfires in Australia, smaller communication platforms and NGOs already showed concern about what was happening in Australia. This allowed some groups to take immediate action and try to minimize the impact in certain zones.
The second reason is related to the diffusion of academic information. While books and libraries were the only possible tool on which a student could rely on in the past, today there is an important amount of electronic information available for students. This is very cost effective, as student now have access to e-journals and e-books from anywhere in the world. Moreover, this allows professionals from different countries to publish and share updated information. For example, in my case, as a dentistry student, I have heavily relied on the internet and selected platforms to stay updated with the latest techniques and cases.
In light of the above, I strongly believe that the access to valuable information outweighs the opposing view, that access to such amounts of information is problematic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amounts of information is problematic.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88515646539 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550964187328 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5976473152 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.894736842 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26508465181 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797286434733 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834180211732 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166092488527 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105237132794 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.