Government should create better network of public transport available for everyone or build more roads owning population.
The importance of goverment should create better network of public transport available for everyone and build more roads population whichh was always debatable has now more become controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other some masses reject this notion. The substantial influence trend has sparked controversy and potential impact recent years. In my opinion former proposition appears to be more rational. I will discuss positive viewpoints and lead to conclusion.
These are myriad reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one stem from the fact that government should create better network for public transport available. firstly, they are many benefits main effect their economic growth. now much people have private transport like, cars, bike, they can easily arrived their designation and comfortably. For instance, In winter season fogg very rapidly change climate and some people go daily for their job. so tha is situation private vehicle very helpful.
Elaborating my view points, there are some merits bot one of effect that it is main effectively rural area students when in some places transport not available. So they easily use their own transport and not face the problems and difficulties to arrived their institution.
According to arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefit their economic growth and rural area people are indeed to great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The importance of goverment should create be...
^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...t available for everyone and build more roads population whichh was always debatable ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... controversy and potential impact recent years. In my opinion former proposition ...
^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ad reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...network for public transport available. firstly, they are many benefits main effect the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Now
...its main effect their economic growth. now much people have private transport like...
^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...main effect their economic growth. now much people have private transport like, car...
^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'arrive'
Suggestion: arrive
...sport like, cars, bike, they can easily arrived their designation and comfortably. For ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...and some people go daily for their job. so tha is situation private vehicle very h...
^^
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'merits'' or 'merit's'?
Suggestion: merits'; merit's
...borating my view points, there are some merits bot one of effect that it is main effec...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 31.9359605911 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54867256637 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70369913932 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650442477876 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.060735943 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.33497536946 187% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286122415201 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076885760699 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121887575571 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140595186959 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119483787217 0.0609392437508 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.