Environment with rubbish
The importance of environment with rubbish which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is hazardous while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate the negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderate one stems from the fact that people have entered a throw away society and fill the environment with rubbish. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that environment with rubbish is very harmful for individual. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
Steps to deal with this problem are many but the most significant ones are not complicated but accessible and practical. Besides, individual rubbish throws by dustbin. Primarily, mostly people increase the environment and rubbish but very harmful for individual and increase the disease.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the problem of environment with rubbish can be successfully addressed provided that the above stated measures are taken.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | sandeep.daksha@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2022-04-15 | ots1 | 77 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | hang9815 | 72 | view |
- shopping moll 11
- parents should be held legally responsible 89
- music is very important 72
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The different methods students using to achieve information. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81299023845 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583732057416 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1055397026 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399146699142 0.242375264174 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155122925103 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140381268916 0.071462118173 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27078791505 0.151781067708 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547843728122 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.