The pie charts illustrate the share of blockbuster genres awarded Oscar prizes in the period between 2003 and 2008, divided into seven sections.

Essay topics:

The pie charts illustrate the share of blockbuster genres awarded Oscar prizes in the period between 2003 and 2008, divided into seven sections.

The pie charts illustrate the share of blockbuster genres awarded Oscar prizes in the period between 2003 and 2008, divided into seven sections.

Overall, there are many noticeable fluctuations among the genres that received Oscar awards such as Thriller, Documentary, Romance. From 2003 to 2008, while the proportion for Oscar winners in Thriller and Horror had a tendency to fall lightly, the respective figures in the others seemed to increase.

In particular, the percentage of Thriller films that achieved Oscar prizes decreased significantly by approximately 10% from over 45% in 2003 to only 35% in 2008 but still kept the highest number of Oscar winners. At the same time, horror films also had a decline from about 15% in 2003 to only 10% left in 2008 that made them become the second-lowest in the total share of winners in Oscar competitions.

However, the other sections such as Documentary, Romance, Science Fiction, Action all had a slight rise between 2003 and 2008. In the period between 2003 and 2008, the awards that are gained from Documentary movies rose just around 3% from 5% to 8%, the Romance and Science Fiction genres also had an inconsiderable increase about 2% and 5%, respectively. Furthermore, there was a noticeable figure in Action films that have developed rapidly and reached 25% in 2008 from approximate 20% in 2003, witnessed as the second-largest piece in the total number of Oscar winners. Meanwhile, for five years between 2003 and 2008, the percentage of Oscar achieves in Comedy movies stayed at a similar level at 5% in the total achieves.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-19 Tan Thao 73 view
Essays by user Tan Thao :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso had an inconsiderable increase about 2% and 5% in 2003 and 2008, respectively...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, while, in particular, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11507936508 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82625221134 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.5857112475 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.222222222 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428318306013 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206010175651 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.282629725512 0.0843802449381 335% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363012581222 0.15604864568 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.369769811831 0.0819641961636 451% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.