The line graph demonstrates the proportion of tourists visiting four different destinations in Edinburgh, Scotland, in the period 1980 and 2010.
The line graph demonstrates the proportion of tourists visiting four different destinations in Edinburgh, Scotland, in the period 1980 and 2010.
Overall, the highest proportion of visitors concentrate mainly on Castle and Festival locations, while the lowest percentage of them stayed at Zoo and Aquarium attractions. Whereas the numbers of travellers in Aquarium and Festival destinations had a fall between 1980 and 2010, the other two attractions tend to increase.
The tourists who visited Castles have a tendency to rise significantly from under 25% in 1980 to 45% in 1995, and then decreasing to 31% in 2010, climb to the first rank in the percentage of visited travellers from the second rank in 1980. Conversely, Castle destinations which ranked first in 1980, therefore, become the second popular destination in 2010 from 30% in 1980 to 25% in 2010.
From 1980 to 1985, the percentage of visitors to Aquarium attractions increased noticeably from 20% in 1980 to 35% in 1985 but then declined considerably for the next years to only 8% in 2010. Nevertheless, Zoo entertainments begin with only 10% in 1980 but fluctuated constantly and reached 20% in 2010.
- The line graph demonstrates the proportion of tourists visiting four different destinations in Edinburgh, Scotland, in the period 1980 and 2010. 100
- The pie charts and table illustrate the share of living accommodation in five types occupied by 25-year-olds and the availability of four kinds of accommodations in London in the period 1990s and 2010s. 73
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Children should allow every parents' advice. 50
- The pie charts illustrate the share of blockbuster genres awarded Oscar prizes in the period between 2003 and 2008, divided into seven sections. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 to 45% in 1995, and then decreasing to 31% in 2010, climb to the first rank in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, nevertheless, second, then, therefore, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28042328042 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07967416038 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3059647937 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422144946575 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.238424229441 0.103423049105 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.315057117662 0.0843802449381 373% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353594986843 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.375943654471 0.0819641961636 459% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.