Recently, it is very common that neighbours do not interact with each other as compare to past. Fast paced life, busy schedules and technology are some of the causes that has lead to distance neighbours from each other. However, with few initiatives this problem can be solved.
One of the reasons that neighbors do not interact and meet with each other is that people are busy in this fast paced environment. They have long working hours where they have to work from morning till evening. When they return back to home, they spend this time with their friends or family. Additionally, with the increasing use of technology, people spend most of their free time on social media platforms, where they interact with different people around the world and do not develop relations with the people next door. While in past as there was limited technology and people had restricted hours to work, they would spend their time with neighbors, resulting in developing good relations. Another cause is the trend of migration, where people move to other cities or countries for better opportunities. Mostly people are not comfortable to interact with neighbours due to the cultural or language barrier and as a result, neighbors do not have friendly relations.
There are number of ways through which this issue can be resolved. Firstly, people need to understand that it is very important to have good relations with neighbors as they are the one who will help each other in the time of emergency. Similarly, community members should arrange monthly social gatherings, where people can meet and greet each other. These events will encourage people to develop friendly relations with each other and create sense of brotherhood among them. People living in same society should celebrate different festivals together in order to involve new residents within the society.Finally,people should limit the time for using social media and spend time with people around them. I concede that it will be difficult for people to limit themselves from social media as it was easier for people in past to meet their neighbours on daily basis as there was limited form of communication.
In conclusion, although it is difficult for people to take some time out from their busy schedules to meet their neighbours. However, it is important for society members to encourage all the people living in the area to interact with each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t interact with each other as compare to past. Fast paced life, busy schedules an...
^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...life, busy schedules and technology are some of the causes that has lead to distance neighb...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...rk from morning till evening. When they return back to home, they spend this time with thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be resolved. Firstly, people need to understand that it is very important to ...
^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions with each other and create sense of brotherhood among them. People living in...
^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...nvolve new residents within the society.Finally,people should limit the time for using ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...new residents within the society.Finally,people should limit the time for using social ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, similarly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06015037594 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67806419152 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448621553885 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3181544442 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192024897721 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776234007013 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615254037884 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137036684177 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161106003777 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.