In light of the current socio-economic situation of the world, do you think this the right time for wild life preservation? If yes, what are the ways and means you suggest for this?
These days, an increasing number of people's are concerned about the right time as well as action of keeping wild life the same as itself and of presenting it from being damaged in socio-economic circumstance of the world. However, whether this time could be suitable or not, and what can be done is a hotly debated topic. From my perspective, I strongly believe that any time is also necessary to protect and keep up of the wild life, and I would suggest possible measures that we could take to wild life conservation in this essay.
Let us begin by considering the need reason to conserve wildlife in the wild is to conserve the ecosystems in which they offer us clean air, clean water, food, and shelter. Forest removal has climatic effects, increases erosion and silts up rivers. Coastal development destroys the natural swamps and dunes that protect the land behind them. And overfishing deprives us of a sustainable supply of animal protein. The protection of the plant and animal, natural areas and important structures are those necessary actions. Therefore, regardless of economics or societal reason, wild life must be preserved at all time. We must conserve and cohabit with the wild which in fact will keep it in the long run.
Nations, organizations and all the people should have co-operation and work together to keep effectively wild life. First, some of the laws should be made to ban the killing or capturing of endangered animals or birds as also the unauthorized cutting of forest trees for timber and wood for fuel should be stopped immediately, and breeding programs for endangered species should be organized. Second, the preservation knowledge for the wild life is given always all everyone and anywhere in place. Avoid using toxic chemicals, cut plastic and never drop litter on garden/land as well as water source of us. All of this can kill the bugs that form the base of the food chain, leaving everyone above them without food. Artificial fertilizers and weed killers have slowly destroyed the soil biome: without its nutrients, bacteria, fungi and microorganisms, the soil is depleted and cannot sustain the wild plants and tiny bugs that the food web needs.
In conclusion, various approaches could be implemented to help conserve driven for the wild life. Here, we should never be scrutinizing whether it is the right time for preserving wild life because any time is a good time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-07 | khai Anna Trần | 64 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | khai Anna Trần | 80 | view |
| 2014-01-26 | Raynaldo Nugroho | 85 | view |
| 2014-01-23 | Raynaldo Nugroho | 90 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- In light of the current socio economic situation of the world do you think this the right time for wild life preservation If yes what are the ways and means you suggest for this 80
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- In light of the current socio economic situation of the world do you think this the right time for wild life preservation If yes what are the ways and means you suggest for this 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r to keep effectively wild life. First, some of the laws should be made to ban the killing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97283950617 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7188918908 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572839506173 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3897203975 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239182400013 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718389505268 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689483189215 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160494972429 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678797541207 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.