The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increase the cost of fuel.
Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?
It is argued that the most effective solution to environmental issues around the world is to lift the price of fuel. I can only partly agree with this view.
It is obvious that increasing the cost of fuel can have a direct impact on consumers’ and industries’ usage of fuel and therefore generating positive results for the environment. From a consumer perspective, the motive to drive or using fuel-driven engines in households would be weakened when the price tag of fuel is less affordable. As a consequence, they will be encouraged to search for alternative types of energy, most of which available is significantly less detrimental to the environment than the fuel itself. The same pattern of behaviors would be seen in most industries since companies want to control the cost of production and profits. In energy production spheres, changing consumer preferences for energy will lead energy manufacturers to adjust themselves to meet consumers’ needs, leaving finding and producing greener forms of energy a new trend.
However, intervention to the cost of fuel would be insufficient to tackle such a global issue as environmental degradation. The government should enact tougher rules and regulations with regard to the environment. Industries, especially heavy carbon dioxide polluters, needs to be brought under close supervision and imposed carbon dioxide quotas. By doing this, CO2 will be significantly reduced and a cleaner and safer environment on Earth will be guaranteed. Moreover, environmental protection campaigns should be encouraged and given adequate publicity to raise global public awareness of environmental preservation.
In conclusion, adjustments to the prices of fuel is a sensible policy to alter the public’s attitudes and behaviors in fuel consumption. However, more actions need to be done to successfully deal with the problem of environmental destruction worldwide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-17 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-20 | moonlucas | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | NigarM | 64 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | hoakim | 89 | view |
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 73
- The use of the mobile phone is antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music film in whichever way they wish There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree 56
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53242320819 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31572029806 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2287260774 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161276979689 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601490462807 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445709893479 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105257512085 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015485133833 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.