Nowadays, we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
In recent years, the increasing amount of garbage has been a serious social problem. In this essay, I will discuss the cause of this issue and explore what governments can do to promote the reduction of rubbish that is produced.
The main reason why the amount of rubbish is increasing these days is consumerism that is prevailing in today’s world. In this context, companies struggle to earn more income, producing an enormous amount of commodities and reducing the production cost as much as possible. In order to do so, they need to utilize very cheap and low-quality materials, which are not reusable, for their products. As a result, customers consume such cheap items more and more, discarding them without reusing. Fast food packaging is a good example, which allows McDonald’s to reduce the cost of packages and increase the hamburger production. Consequently, the amount of garbage that the food chain produces has been rising for the past few decades.
There are some solutions to this problem that governments can do. Firstly, they can establish laws on companies and citizens to restrict rubbish production. For example, taxing according to the amount of litter or imposing fine on offenders should be effective. Secondly, they should encourage companies to develop reusable materials and products by providing subsidies. This allows companies to reduce the production costs and the prices of their products, leading to an increase in the usage of reusable items. As a result, the amount of rubbish will decrease significantly.
In conclusion, consumerism in modern society is the leading cause of the increasing amount of rubbish. Governmental control of the quantity of garbage and encouragement for the development of reusable items are reasonable solutions to this issue.
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 70
- Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with police or the military Others think women are less suitable for this kind of job Discuss both views and give your opinion 69
- Many people believe that individuals are responsible for their own happiness while others think happiness is dependent on other external factors Discuss both views and include your own opinion 64
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30526315789 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92304920965 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8286664549 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313889280348 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963782161492 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732487955494 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183394078841 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612115446042 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30526315789 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92304920965 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536842105263 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8286664549 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313889280348 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963782161492 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732487955494 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183394078841 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612115446042 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.