The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su

Essay topics:

The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Controlling the government and politicians has always been a debatable issue in society. The statement maintains that questioning the politicians could improve society which I strongly agree with this claim and I explain my idea now.

In the democratic society, there are numerous ways to question authority ranging from parliament, newspapers, independent broadcast to tweeter and blogs. All of these opportunities provide some situations for individuals and experts to explain their ideas and deeply scrutinize the government's decisions. Thus, any mistakes that have been done by authorities would have seen by them and as politicians aware of this situation try to avoid any corruption. If any bribery would happen, columnist force the authority to resign his job and this process help the society to refine the governors.

New politicians or some of them that want to be a president or parliament member know that every action would be seen by people and if they are going to join the government to abuse power would change their minds. Therefore, just some experts that want to improve society and have sufficient knowledge try to take the power and this process continuously improves all of the aspects of society.

On the other hand, some disagree with the claim and assert that if anybody could question the government so, the authorities should use a lot of time for answering their questions and it would distract their focus on improving society. Moreover, all of the people are not experts in all of the fields to question authority. These reasons could not provide sufficient cogent evidence to show defects of this method because the authorities have various consultants that have enough time to answer to the public's questions and in the society, some people are expert in a specific field and they can question the government on that fields.

In conclusion, I strongly believe questioning the authority could evolve the society since it could prevent corruption and expert individuals would join the government.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-03 raghavchauhan619 66 view
2023-09-04 SamikshaVarpe 58 view
2023-09-04 Siddhant412 66 view
2023-07-10 KruthiHK 50 view
2023-07-09 ZHOU0444 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ali.rs :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... and this process continuously improves all of the aspects of society. On the other han...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r focus on improving society. Moreover, all of the people are not experts in all of the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r, all of the people are not experts in all of the fields to question authority. These rea...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23853211009 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81555565823 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498470948012 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5949289416 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143579594196 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584342101215 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456660449493 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875080738215 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034495290641 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... and this process continuously improves all of the aspects of society. On the other han...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r focus on improving society. Moreover, all of the people are not experts in all of the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r, all of the people are not experts in all of the fields to question authority. These rea...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23853211009 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81555565823 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498470948012 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5949289416 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143579594196 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584342101215 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456660449493 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875080738215 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034495290641 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.