.Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
In recent years, the issue of many today’s museums witness an increase in the number of visitors instead of the locals has aroused people’s discussion. Although this problem can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions can be addressed.
That the local communities show no interest in museums or local heritage sites is certain to trigger undesirable problems. First, since the local heritage sites are familiar to local people, they are no longer inclined to explore more. In fact, both of the locals and students have been conveyed historical information such as wars, or wars relics through mass media like televisions and radios, the school curriculum and among others, discouraging them from discovering more about these places. Second, by recognizing the existence of these museums located in the vicinity near the place of living, there is a high possibility that citizens would procrastinate the visits. This means that they are unware of the importance of paying visits to these historical sites, taking them for granted.
The problem above, nevertheless, can be remedied, provided that sonme of the following preparatory steps are taken. If the regions’historical relics are updated into a modern trend, they would catch the locals’attention. For example, museums should be equipped with 3D projection technology, which helps trigger the locals’ curiosity and they will pay visits to these places as frequent as going to movies. Additionally, in order to create a lively environment making local people find it interesting, local authorities should organise a handful of festivals. To illustrate, folk festivals and traditional festivals can be held in museums to attract people; therfore, making them concious of their local customs and traditions.
In conclusion, due to the familiarity and the procrastination of local people, they pay less visits to region’s historical relics than travellers. By transforming tradional museums to cutting-edged ones and holding more entertainments, it would help improve the quantity of the locals visting these places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-22 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | anh thu080903 | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | komal25 | 67 | view |
- the consumption of Australian teenagers 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 89
- this gragh below shows the percentage of Auastralian exports to four countries from 1990 to 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...liar to local people, they are no longer inclined to explore more. In fact, both ...
^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun visits is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ocrastination of local people, they pay less visits to region’s historical relics th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs. By transforming tradional museums to cutting-edged ones and holding more ente...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53250773994 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15969717273 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600619195046 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8576548866 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.642857143 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417285020145 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131073728651 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371176486033 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242501893372 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379124503107 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.