tpo33
The lecture and reading are both about the theories of the stone ball using and meaning. The lecturer disagrees with concepts, which are mentions in the reading for the following reasons.
First of all, the trouble of using caved stones as weapons in hunting. The professor suggests that those stones did not use as weapons because if the people at that period used them on a surface. they would have sign-on stones as broke edges or crack. then, he mentions that there is no damages in those stones. As a result, those stones did not use as weapons, However, the reading disagrees with this idea.
Secondly, the trouble of using stones in weight and measures. The teacher asserts that stone did not use for this purpose because they have different weight. Those stones made from various types of stones, Quarter and rocks. If those things used for measurement, they should have the same weight and make from the same materials. On the other hand, The author says that those stones used to measure quantities of grain and food.
Finally, the problem of using carved stones for a social purpose. The teacher says that people did not use those stones for this purpose because they made with a simple pattern. they do not have value for the people. Moreover, If those stones had value for people, They would put them in tombs. thus, He mentions that there is no any stones buried with people when they died
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-05 | shuya | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | Kawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | Hamide | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | fafoolisalar | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | fafoolisalar | 70 | view |
- which one better traditional class or online class 73
- tpo32 70
- Some people think that they achieve success by being like others but others perfer to be different which do you think is better 60
- tpo 36 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... at that period used them on a surface. they would have sign-on stones as broke edge...
^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...sign-on stones as broke edges or crack. then, he mentions that there is no damages i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no damages'?
Suggestion: there are no damages
... edges or crack. then, he mentions that there is no damages in those stones. As a result, those sto...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ecause they made with a simple pattern. they do not have value for the people. Moreo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...r people, They would put them in tombs. thus, He mentions that there is no any stone...
^^^^
Line 8, column 328, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... tombs. thus, He mentions that there is no any stones buried with people when they...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75203252033 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10509848208 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479674796748 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1679652905 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.7647058824 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374333400202 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147133665904 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700322472402 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240437468506 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499864799621 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.