: Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people's health. Do you agree or disagree?
Health problems are being dramatically concerned nowadays. Therefore, some people argue that dishes and drink proved by scientists are harmful to people must be banned in such places like restaurant or mall. Personally, I totally follow this idea because of the rationales following.
Although using foods whose bad influences are recorded by researchers might very delicious such as fast food, people’s health will totally be badly affected. Statistics have proved that food like junk food or canned food are definitely dangerous since they contain a huge amount of preservative. If humans consume this substance for long time, it will lead to numerous problems such as obesity, allergy, food poisonous or even heart attack which cause lots of deaths every year.
Additionally, the health results will be similar when people use beverage containing alcohol or stimulant. To be more specific, when people use drink such as beer or cafe in a limited rate, it will help people to gain more energy or even enhance their health. But if people drink them too much, the consequence will turn to another side. To illustrate, being addicted to these drink will make human health be damaged. Take beer as an example, science has shown that a glass of beer per day will assist human with a better circulation, but if beer is abused, human can face with numerous problems with their health. First, the liver will be poisonous. Then, your cardiovascular system will be destroyed, leading to heart attack and finally people can die.
To sum up, people must follow the issue that has been checked specifically by researchers to make sure and safe each their life.
- Global warming is a big problem What are the causes and solutions 89
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 84
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 88
- 2 People nowadays do not recycle What are the causes and solutions to it 89
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communications between managers and workers is important while other people say that other factors are more important What is your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, then, therefore, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09157509158 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60498027986 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4960498651 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323104565989 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122730360569 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734732411108 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187026373077 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639722084597 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.