A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Society right now tends to evaluate people based on their social background or wealth. Therefore, positive hallmarks of human dignity like honour, kindness and trust are likely to be forgotten. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement because of the rationale following.
First of all, It is clear that old values are the key to modern people in judging anyone. To clarify, these standards are the core elements creating the character of a person so that they can assist individuals in evaluating others in a more specific way. For instance, to become an official employee in any company, the candidate must go through the interview round. The employer will assess not only the knowledge or the experiences the interviewee has but also his or her behaviour before making the final decision. Hence, old-fashioned values are still necessary.
Moreover, the richer a person is, it does not mean that the more respect he or she will gain. Take some celebrities as an example. They are really famous as well as always showing off their wealth. However, only a minority of people truly care about or admire them. In contrast, lots of individuals without any luxury possessions are still respected by others for their attitudes and their contributions to society. For example, a few teachers who just have above-average income but are always being praised by not only students but also parents because of their knowledge, their responsibility for teaching, their dedication and support. Thus, traditional values still exist and live there throughout time.
In conclusion, social status and material possessions do not show the true self of a person. Old-fashioned values still remain in society and they are the criteria to judge a person’s worth. I believe that the public should definitely think carefully and consider all aspects of a person prior to evaluating them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 72
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drink that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people s health Do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20723684211 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8174164477 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2084358745 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9444444444 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176468180739 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553605021111 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651708830976 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119302199266 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722228637027 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.