TPO 39
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
There is no shortage of opinion on the whether it was more accessible to choose secure careers in the previous time. In my opinion, the career choosing is more accessible in the today's world. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, students are available to gain information about the career which they like because there are reliable websites and advisers nowadays. Moreover, the dependable sources provide invaluable data for the people who are going to decide the future career. Unfortunately, this type of sources were not available in the past, which leads people to choose wrong profession. However, currently, people are capable of revealing what kind of job would be successful later. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter was influenced by my own experience. The last year, I was doubtful about my major field because I did not know which career will be the dominant profession of the destiny. Fortunately, I could study the international research about the projection of careers, and arranged meeting with counselors about the national study on this matter. Afterwards, I could choose appropriate field for me, programming. Drawing from my own experience, studying about the future careers are accessible to the every people who seek the knowledge, which helps them to choose proper branch.
Secondly, during the last several years, many change took place all around the world. These modifications altered the attitude towards the careers, especially the branch of the science. Furthermore, people could not benefit from the change because the future was unpredictable. To be more specific, there are many unemployed train engineers in my country although they have satisfactory qualifications of universities. Because they could not predict that engineer of the train would not be the mainstay of economic few years later, they choose the unsuitable career. Fortunately, the later time will be more predictable than the former period, which means individuals are able to anticipate the following term and choose acceptable profession. In conclusion, change around the world is decelerated, thus it is possible to anticipate the attitude towards the jobs in the coming years.
To sum up, choosing the appropriate working field is relatively possible for the people from the present than past. This is because more information are accessible and change around the world is predictable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- TPO 34 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 80
- These days people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time Going to a mu 73
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 73
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 70
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to secure'
Suggestion: to secure
...hether it was more accessible to choose secure careers in the previous time. In my opi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
... the past, which leads people to choose wrong profession. However, currently, people ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 882, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to appropriate'
Suggestion: to appropriate
...this matter. Afterwards, I could choose appropriate field for me, programming. Drawing from...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun change seems to be countable; consider using: 'many changes'.
Suggestion: many changes
...econdly, during the last several years, many change took place all around the world. These ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3155216285 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89075098976 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503816793893 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0475460122 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4761904762 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130500554038 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402917172781 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382085470403 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07129435477 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396465895061 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.