In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future

Essay topics:

In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.

Nowadays, many people are striving for their career success in this competitive society. Some people believe that it is much easier to figure out a successful future career path in the past than in the modern world while others hold the opposite view. From where I stand, I do not concur with the former idea and assert that the modern society provides more chances for the young generation to achieve.

First of all, people in today's world is more accessible to information that is impossible to be reached in the past. Several decades ago, the under-developed technology made people to lead an isolated live that they had few ways to get the recent information about the events happened around the world, not mentioning the promising jobs. On the contrary, thanks to the wide-spread Internet, people in the modern era are able to follow the step of the newly breakthroughs in any fields, thereby finding their career opportunities. My father's personal experience just provides a striking example. My father told me that when he was a teenager, the only way to find a job was to check the employment notification on the village's billboard or being introduced by their relatives. There were few chances for him to get to know the promising jobs in the city because he was exposed to the environment where information could not come in. However, due to the advent of Internet era, my father are informed with the lasted trend and explore the potential

In addition, there are more assistance available for the young generations to identify the job in order to succeed in the future. Unlike the citizens in the past, people in today's world are more willing to share their knowledge or personal experience to inspire others due to the increased level of education. As a result, people could spare no effort to find out some useful suggestions when they seek jobs. My father's experience still is a compelling example to explain the point made above. When my father graduated from university, he felt disappointed to his classmate since all of them were to self-fish to provide useful advice on seeking job. It seemed like, for people at that time, competition was more important than cooperation. However, in today's civilized world, people are more willing to share due to the increased life quality and the strengthened belief of cooperation. Therefore, it is much easier for the young to find information from colleagues, friends, or even the strangers from the online community, which could help them to evaluate and make a sensible decision about their future career.

In sum, I still believe that it is much easier for people to identify the job leading to success future in today's world.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-25 Zmx_6 73 view
2023-06-25 Zmx_6 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Zmx_6 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'villages'' or 'village's'?
Suggestion: villages'; village's
...heck the employment notification on the villages billboard or being introduced by their ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, while, as to, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93626373626 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71703468927 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5937358625 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18121028394 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601279249398 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719221460856 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156203369723 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797393196816 0.0645574589148 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.