In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of people pursuing the career success in this competitive society. In the face of consistent failures and obstacles, some people believe that it was much easier to find out a successful career path in the past than in the modern world, while others hold the opposite view. From where I stand, I do nor agree with the former idea and think the current world is more suitable and security for people to succeed.
First of all, people in today's world is accessible to more information that could not be reached in the past. Several decades ago, the undeveloped Internet caused people to live isolated and the only way for them to obtain the information about promising career was from people around them or the news reports on TV. However, with the advent of advanced website and convenient smartphone applications, people in this era are able to follow the newly breakthroughs and the prospective industries, which ensure them to have a stable and bright career future. My father's personal experience just provides a striking example. Almost three decades ago, my father was an ambitious youth who were thirsty to create his own career. However, my father told me, the only way he found job was by reading the limited employment notification on the board. In addition, as my father lived in a small town, he needed to ride a bike for an hour to get the information, which was a pretty hard experience. But in today's world, when my father sees some potential customers or aeras which suitable to expand his company, he just makes a call to make a cooperation. What an efficient way to develop his career!
In addition, there are more assistance available to help people to recognize the promising job. Unlike citizens in the past, people in today's world are more willing to communicate and share opinions with others due the wide-spread education system, thereby making people to have more assistance or objective advice to choose their future career. My father's experience also provides another compelling example. He told me that in the past, few people were willing to provide any useful suggestion about which job to choose, which field to engage, as people at that time were somewhat selfish and were afraid of have more competitors. On the contrary, with the increasing level of education, people in modern society are more open-minded and they believe cooperation is better than competition. Therefore, people likely give some useful suggestions about the good job options. In addition, people can also find some useful experience on the Internet to evaluate by themselves.
In sum, I still believe that it is much easier for people to identify the job leading to success future in today's world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explore 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 73
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum or P ramorum was first detected in the forests of the western United States P ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees in many infected oaks leaves wither rapidly la 83
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2290.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96746203905 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66624098848 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51409978308 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6526624391 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.526315789 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2631578947 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189668462316 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619063778126 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688717813232 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157541210108 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830705247352 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.