The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050
The bar chart compares four different nations, namely Japan, China, USA and India, in terms of the proportion of the global people in two the year 1950 and 2002, and prediction for 2050.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that China and India have the highest percentages of the residents, whereas the figures for Japan is by far the lowest during the research period. Additionally, while the rates of citizens in India increases, the opposite is true for the other countries over the period shown.
In 1950, China was the most populous area with the figure recording around 23%, while the Indian people accounted for 15% of the world population. By contrast, about 7% of inhabitants on earth were from the USA, compared to only less than 5% from Japan. Over the 52 years ensuing, the percentage of the citizens in India increased slightly, whilst China, Japan and the USA all witnessed declines in their figures.
In 2050, the Indian residents are predicted to rise and it would contribute nearly 20% of the worldwide inhabitants. In contrast, the data for China and Japan are projected to fall to 15% and 2% respectively. Meanwhile, the rate of the global population being American is forecasted to remain the same, at 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-03 | dinhthu05 | 92 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | jashan978 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view |
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 67
- In many countries people like to eat a wider range of food that cannot be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 84
- The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 2008 78
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is to make parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89099526066 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6457640454 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611374407583 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1033746751 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208775248788 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775579400321 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533621951355 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122172757081 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316238518173 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.