which one better traditional class or online class?
There are different ways of teaching like engaging in online class or face to face class. Most of the people are admitted that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration in order to examine the destructive and instructive issues of these facets. From my vantage points, I wholeheartedly believe that the classroom environment has a positive influence in student for the following reasons.
To begin with, meeting with others is more convenient for the student. They could discuss in persons about their assignment and declare their opinion that would have a positive effect on students’ knowledge and information. For instance, when younger students engage in university, they keep in contact with their professors and classmates that help them to get a lot of information especially when they have trouble in a specific subject. They could ask the professor and find the answer instantly because many of their teachers have optimal information and have good experience in their knowledge and the way to deliver this knowledge. In addition, being engaged in regular class impose on students to finish and accomplish their assignment in the time because they do not have flexible time to studying. In oppose to use the online class, students should look for their knowledge when they have a problem or need to solve their questions. They spend a lot of time in searching for their issue. Also, they always have trouble understanding their subject because they do not have one that could declare and explain their subject like face to face class. Consequently, being participated in the classroom could enhance student information.
Secondly, Being in the classroom could have a tremendous impact on students’ personalities. Students could improve their behaviors during being in meeting class. For instance, may students are dependent on their parents when they are in high school. They do not have enough experience in there life like speak infront a large number of people, use public transportation, driving the car, and making friends with a diverse age of persons. But when they enroll in university, especially campus and class life, that would help learn many new things. For example, My brother was very shy when he was in high school and hesitated to speak infront strange persons. But when he enrolled in campus’s class, He started to learn how to explain and discuss his opinion in order to succeed in his education and accomplish his studying. As a result, when he got hired, his maneger liked his personality and experience and gave him a high position in his company because he has convinced personalty and he could impact on costumers. All of that, he learns during the campus’s life. Consequently, face to face class and campus life could influence in students' personalities.
To wrap it up, For all a contemplating reasons, studying in traditional class have a positive impact on student education, information and personalities.
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 66
- Do you agree or disagree that exercise is important for only ages people 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 70
- which one better to work close to your home or to live far away from your work with high salary which one you would like and why 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rience in there life like speak infront a large number of people, use public transportation, driv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17842323651 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87615926953 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45643153527 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4591305596 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.52173913 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9565217391 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136666689327 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518601746567 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751129525299 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115474147942 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372993469052 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.