A city is trying to decide what to do with a large building that has become available in order to make it useful for city residents.
Which ONE of the following solutions would you recommend? Why?
1. Develop the building into housing for people who have low incomes
2. Develop the building into a modern shopping and entertainment center
3. Tear down the building and develop a park on the land.
Some people think that developing the building into housing for people who have low incomes is useful for city residents. Other people think that developing the building into a modern shopping and entertainment center is better. However, I think that tear down the building and develop a park on the land is the most useful for residents. Therefore, I support with my statement for the following reasons.
First of all, for the purpose of making the policy useful for residents. the mayor cares about residents’ health, and building a park can improve residents’ health. For example, if the mayor tears down the building and builds a natural park in capital, residents can take strolls delightfully and breath fresh air in the park. Furthermore, people can also go jogging in the park after working for relaxing. As a result, people strength their body and get a good mental health because of the park.
Secondly, in order to be useful for citizens from the policy, the mayor places emphasis on people’s economic ability, and building a park might not give high pressure on people’s economy. For instance, if the government decides to tear down a house and build a park in NewYork, it would increase lower than 5% taxes for building a park. Besides, the park is free for everyone to use in the future. As a consequence, the citizens might pay less money to enjoy the fasciniating park. Yet, if the government dicides to bulid a house for people who have low incomes, it might increase 15% or above taxes to citizens. Furthermore, the government might tax extra money from citizens for supplying the people who have low salaries. Obviously, the policy might cost citizens a lot and make them stressed.
Last but not least, to make the policy good for people, the mayor focuses on education, and developing a park can educate people more. For instance, if the official build a forest park in Tainan, teacher might tour their students to observe wild animals such as birds and squirrals. In addition, students can also portrait animals in the forest park for practicing painting skills. Hence, students can learn life science and art from the forest park. Nevertheless, if the official develop the building into a modern shopping and entertainment center, people might not learn anything but have fun. Additionally, students might not pay more attention on their academic performance because of entertainment such as movie theather. Apparently, people cannot learn anything from shopping and entertainment centers.
In conclusion, I strongly support the government to build a park in cityfor residents. After all, the official cares about residents’ health, economic condition, and education.
- It is important to have rules about the kind of clothing people should wear to go to work and school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 76
- Some companies provide important products or services but these products or services also lead to damage on the environment As a consequence some people claim government should resort to greater penalty tax and fine to contain the harm made by these compa 73
- It is important to have rules about the kind of clothing people should wear to go to work and school 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- During the times of economic crisis which of the following should the government spend less money on a Education b Health Care c Support for the unemployed 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...making the policy useful for residents. the mayor cares about residents’ health, an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14027149321 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76681200374 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445701357466 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4648233224 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.88 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.68 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.32 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328219861158 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108808612503 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931000881161 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200802284275 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112690914587 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.