Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it? Touring historic sites; going to markets or shops; eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes.
Wandering around a city, the first-time visitor can be completely dazed and lost. Provided the time is limited and we want to know the city in the best way possible, we can choose various different approaches. Some people may think of visiting museums, while others would prefer to visit local markets and restaurants. Well, personally, if I were to choose one option among all these preferences, I would like to opt for visiting the local eating or dining place because visiting historical sites and markets could be time-consuming. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two main reasons and their examples that substantiate my stance.
First, by having your meal at the local restaurants we can get acquainted to local people there, who can guide us to visit the city in a best way. They can help us shortlist the famous places that are worth visiting. They can highlight the specialty or what their place is famous for. As a result, we could utilise our time efficiently and get to know the best people in less time. When I ventured on a trip to south India, we just had a month to explore all the places, and I was really confused about which place to visit first. When I visited a local cafe there and interacted with the local people and waiters, I got the right direction to start my journey. Hence, according to this experience, I was able to explore the cities with the assistance of people I met at the local café.
Second, you will be able to know about the economic and social life of people living in that city. If they eat and dine quietly, it indicates that they are highly educated and well-mannered. If they relish different cuisines, it means that city consists of immigrants. Also, from the food they serve, we can learn a lot about their history, culture, and traditions. My personal experience is a good case in point. When I visited Maklaudgan, the hotel I stayed in was highly inspired by Chinese culture. When I asked about it to one of the staff, they told me all the history of the kingdom of Mongols that built that city.
In conclusion, I would like to reaffirm my viewpoint that it is better to prefer to visit any local eating place rather than wasting your time at markets and traditional sites. To recapitulate, while eating at local places, we can get enough knowledge about the local as well as traditional cultures. In addition to this, we can also judge the economic and social condition of the area while talking to native citizens. Therefore, due to the aforementioned factors, visiting a local restaurant for dining is the best way to explore a particular city.
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it Touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurants or spending time in cafes 70
- Knowledge gained through experience is more important than that obtained by reading books 70
- Face to face communication is better than other modes of communications Do you agree or not 76
- Some local languages are becoming extinct Do you think this is a positive or negative development 76
- Friend influence the students more than their teachers 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
..., who can guide us to visit the city in a best way. They can help us shortlist th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68260869565 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66040774623 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2500244443 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.652173913 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253515768187 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678647928911 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578587620784 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155642927749 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649360188332 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.