The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
The pie charts illustrates comparison of why people chose to commute by bicycle or by car. Both the pie graphs scrutinise five various reasons and the units are measured in percentages.
A glimpse over the diagram portray some intriguing patterns. Overall, it is clearly seen that people who are more conscious about health and fitness, and environment safety preferred riding bicycle. Driving car, on the other hand, highly recommended for convenient purpose.
The first pie statistics depict information that the majority (30%) of people ride bikes for the sake of health and fitness. Similarly, the same percentage (just less than a third) of workers utilised it to reduce pollution. Followed by that, a less parking issues were the reason for less than a fifth (15%) of people to use it. Likewise, a quarter percent of people used it as it is faster than driving and No costs (12% and 13%, respectively).
In terms of driving a car to work, two-fifth (40%) of people hugely preferred as it provides comfort rather than bicycle. Whereas, just over one fifth (21%) percent of people used it in a bid to distance to work. Nearly, 28% of people ride a car because it is faster than a cycle and convenient to carry things to work unlike a bicycle. Finally, around 11 percent of working people used car since it is safer than cycling.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 87
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y preferred riding bicycle. Driving car, on the other hand, highly recommended f...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icycle. Driving car, on the other hand, highly recommended for convenient purpos...
^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t provides comfort rather than bicycle. Whereas, just over one fifth 21% percent of peo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, likewise, similarly, so, third, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80786026201 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60860657885 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585152838428 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.8090785831 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6923076923 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260928110568 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930202127623 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858089830094 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155234781999 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859847548429 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.