Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development?
Globalisation is here to stay, driven by advances in information technology and resulting in scientific, technological and economic progress and increased international trade and investment. It has had wide-ranging positive and negative effects on employment and economic development, scientific research, language and culture, and the environment.
One positive result of globalisation is the global distribution of labour. It is now much easier to move to other countries to find work, and this leads to better employment prospects for individuals and to more diverse workplaces. In addition, capital and industrial resources have migrated to developing countries, thus providing local jobs and boosting local economies. It has also resulted in greater contact between different cultures, as travel has become relatively safer and less expensive than it used to be. Ease of communication has encouraged an unprecedented level of global scientific research and cooperation, and a subsequent explosion of knowledge and information.
In conclusion, globalisation is a double-edged sword that has created jobs and promoted international cooperation but has led to cultural losses, more environmental damage, increased health risks and exposure to economic crises. However, our world will continue to shrink as technology expands, and we need to accept globalisation as a fact of life in the 21st century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-26 | patrick2312 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | patrick2312 | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | Hector Padilla | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | Hector Padilla | 56 | view |
| 2020-02-06 | tranhien297 | 81 | view |
- test 3 3
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- dinosaurs 65
- technology has made children less creative. 60
- Do you prefer to stay in one place or move around? 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 206.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83980582524 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45627318077 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655339805825 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0924829375 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172586185977 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634893418058 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549952062246 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106190426937 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268405226224 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.